Taxes in India are imposed by the Central Government and the state governments. Some lesser taxes are also imposed by the local authorities such as the Municipality. The authority to charge a tax is determined from the Constitution of India which designates the power to charge different taxes between the Central and the State. A major limitation on this power is Article 265 of the Constitution which states that "No tax shall be charge or obtained except by the authority of law".
Types of Tax in India:-
Tax of Central government of India-
(b) High-speed diesel
(d) Natural gas
(e) Flight turbine fuel and
(f)Tobacco and tobacco products
Tax of State Government of India-
Tax litigation process in India:-
Typically, the tax debate first arises before the tax court, which acts in a quasi-judicial way. Tax dispute decision has been a key centre field for the overall tax function. This arises due to a combination of circumstances, which involve courageous taxpayers, an aggressive implementation climate as well as delays and long pendency in the dispute resolution bureaucracy. The usual litigation process in India (hierarchy wise) is described below:
As an option to the Commissioner (Appeals), certain taxpayers (foreign companies or taxpayers in whose case transfer pricing adjustments are made) have the possibility of addressing the ‘Dispute Resolution Panel’, which is a collegium of 3 Commissioners of Income-tax. The Dispute Resolution Panel layout offers some key advantages, which include:
The taxpayer’s questions to the plan assessment proposed by the Assessing Officer will be selected in a time-bound manner (nine months from the end of the month from the date of Assessing Officer’s order).
The tax experts do not have the right to prefer an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upon an assessment concluded based on the Dispute Resolution Panel’s order i.e. on points that are confirmed in side of the taxpayer.
The tax demand does not fructify till the period the matter is determined by the Dispute Resolution Panel. Despite these advantages, the decision on whether to request the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Dispute Resolution Panel requires careful attention of various factors and trends on a case by case basis.
Procedures to resolve disputes before commencing proceedings in a civil court/tribunal-
The taxpayer must file objections to the draft order submitted by the Assessing Officer (AO) within 30 days of the letter of the draft order (see Question 4, Tax assessments). Taxpayers are not bound to guarantee the payment of the tax assessed until the final order is passed by the AO in accordance with DRP management. The DRP has 9 months to consider the AO's and the taxpayer's facts and arguments and issue commands to the AO. Directions published by the DRP are required on the AO and the AO must issue the final rule in accordance with these regulations within 30 days of receipt. The DRP can affirm, decrease or improve the additions suggested by AO. However, it cannot remand the thing back to the AO. If the taxpayer is unsatisfied with the resolution, he can file an appeal with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
The taxpayer can file an appeal (even for transfer pricing matters as well as cases of foreign companies and non-residents) with the CIT(A) within 30 days of receipt of the last order. Taxpayers are not bound to guarantee the payment of the tax assessed. However, they must pay extra taxes, except the demand is visited by administrative jurisdictions. The CIT(A) can confirm, reduce, improve or annul the assessment. In addition, a taxpayer can ask the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) / Commissioners of Income Tax (CIT) to grant protection from prosecution if he has made an application for adjustment under the Income Tax Act 1961 (Income Tax Act) and the procedures for settlement have abated (section 278AB, Income-tax Act).
The main procedures used for the early resolution of criminal law offenses before trial-
Where actions are commenced, the accused can support the case by:
Section 279(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 provides that any offense under chapter XXII can, either before or after the initiation of proceedings, be combined by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax or the Director-General of Income-tax, in light of certain factors (such as the control of the person and the kind and quantity of the offense).